in the revelation book it talks about jesus' witnesses.
were are true witnesses of jesus, not those who teach that jesus is the almighty god, but really true witnesses of jesus.. this is what the revelation book ways about witnesses of jesus:.
19:10 ..... brothers who have the work of witnessing concerning jesus.
Look how the book of Revelation speaks of these 2 men as Witnesses too.
In Revelation 11:3–12 is a description of two individuals who will help accomplish God’s work during the tribulation: “I will appoint my two witnesses, and they will prophesy for 1,260 days, clothed in sackcloth” (verse 3). Nowhere does the Bible identify these two witnesses by name, although people through the years have speculated.
in the revelation book it talks about jesus' witnesses.
were are true witnesses of jesus, not those who teach that jesus is the almighty god, but really true witnesses of jesus.. this is what the revelation book ways about witnesses of jesus:.
19:10 ..... brothers who have the work of witnessing concerning jesus.
original reddit post (removed).
Las Malvinas son Argentinas, put me down for 483 ,high expectations 😁
original reddit post (removed).
Toblerone5, that must have been the verses he used with Djiana to convince her that open marriage has a Sciptural basis because I never heard this argument before, it must be playing alot on his mind😁
luke 23:43 - and jesus said to him, "positively i say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.
nwt places comma here , giving a totally different meaning to the verse.
now the average jw uses this to back their doctrine and it seems in itself virtually impossible to reason with them on it.
Feel free to watch the following video it will answer all your questions
luke 23:43 - and jesus said to him, "positively i say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.
nwt places comma here , giving a totally different meaning to the verse.
now the average jw uses this to back their doctrine and it seems in itself virtually impossible to reason with them on it.
Rattigan350, no one has gone to heaven before Christ and Paradise is not in heaven. Are there verses to prove those 2 statements?
Elihah was transported to another part of Israel where he continued his ministry and Enoch was removed from life, never said he went to heaven.
luke 23:43 - and jesus said to him, "positively i say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.
nwt places comma here , giving a totally different meaning to the verse.
now the average jw uses this to back their doctrine and it seems in itself virtually impossible to reason with them on it.
EasyPrompt, so in your understanding when Greeks and Jews used the name Tartarus to describe a literal physical abode for imprisoning fallen angels they were wrong because YOU 20 centuries later believe otherwise, is that right?
the watchtower is officially in the renovation business now (no more building) because the "brothers"(freemasonic scum of pensylvania?
) know best 🤣🤣🤣.
***from the latest watchtower article 07/12/23.
iloowy.goowy, freemasons like the gnostics before them were adversarial to Christian values and beliefs, I'm not their friend and do not care about their masterplan
the watchtower is officially in the renovation business now (no more building) because the "brothers"(freemasonic scum of pensylvania?
) know best 🤣🤣🤣.
***from the latest watchtower article 07/12/23.
STUDY ARTICLE 37 Rely on Jehovah, as Samson Did, paragraph 7.
I see we have many Freemasons amongst us
the watchtower is officially in the renovation business now (no more building) because the "brothers"(freemasonic scum of pensylvania?
) know best 🤣🤣🤣.
***from the latest watchtower article 07/12/23.
The Watchtower is officially in the renovation business NOW (no more building) because the "brothers"(Freemasonic scum of Pensylvania?) know best 🤣🤣🤣
***from the latest Watchtower article 07/12/23
